The Indian squad had been named. Due to injury concerns the team has been named only for the 1st 2 matches v. SL. Ganguly, Kaif will have to prove their fitness by the end of the 2nd match to considered for the forthcoming matches/series.
- Virender Sehwag
- Sachin Tendulkar
- Gautam Gambhir
- Rahul Dravid (captain)
- Yuvraj Singh
- Venugopal Rao
- Suresh Raina
- JP Yadav
- MS Dhoni (wk)
- Harbhajan Singh
- Murali Kartik
- Irfan Pathan
- Ajit Agarkar
- S Sreesanth
- RP Singh.
Kiran More and the selection team have done well. It seems, now that the overpowering, imposing obstacle of the Gangles-Dalmiya axis is missing, the essential parts of the Indian cricket machine have got a life and mind of their own.
Taking out the rookies, the rest practically selected themselves. The selection of the rookies named was expected, especially after the Challenger Tryout Trophy completed recently. It was the omissions that were the surprising element of this team.
Ganguly: Injury – physical and mental. Injury or not, would Gangles WANT to be back, now that his powerbase seems to be eroding.
Kaif: Injury – unfortunate. I would have liked to see the Chappell-Kaif-Dravid trigon working in the absence of Ganguly the batter. From the noises in the media, Kaif is the likely choice as potential longer term captain, once this ‘rough’ patch in Indian cricket smooths itself out. Kaif seems to be the answer to ‘After Ganguly and Dravid, who?’
VVSLaxman: Very Very Sad Laxman? This was surprising. Going on previous selections, a 48 and a 100 would have cemented a team place for a year, guaranteed. More print will be out criticizing, justifying, commending this omission. Especially with his involvment in the Chappell-Ganguly spat recently. Did Kiran More and the selection team have the memory of this at the back of their minds?
Zed: He has been inconsistent of late. The rest should do him good and also might get that ‘fire in the belly’ reignited. This omission should also serve as a message to other players. Should this rational, logical trend continue, the players will understand that performance is paramount to maintain a place in the side. It’s how you play and not who you know, that will get you selected.
Sree Santh caught the necessary attention and was duly rewarded for dedicated, disciplined bowling. He should now be taken into the fold and nurtured and instill the requirements of performance at this level. Well done Sree Santh.
Chappell, the Fans and possibly the Indian team got what they have been asking for. A non-biased (?), non-partisan selection. Time to get this machine into gear and justify the changes taking place, albeit slowly.
osted earlier under cricket alter-ego - RJ on [World Cricket Blog]
World Cricket Blog's mention by [WeblogWatch: BBC]

I subscribed to sportingstreams.com since the India-Pakistan series not so long ago and have been more than satisfied. Added advantage that you can also get links to streams for F1, the new A1 grandprix, football/soccer.
October 4th, 2005 at 10.28 am
Just looked at sportingstreams.com and it seems way too cheap to be legal. There is also no way of seeing a test clip. R J: Is it a proper stream or someone filming the tv? And what’s the bitrate? A friend got conned on a similar site for football where the bitrate was only 36kbps..
As the saying goes.. if an offer’s too good to be true it usually is..
October 4th, 2005 at 1.29 pm
I am pretty much happy with the quality. I have not used Willow since I tried Sportingstreams and was happy with the quality and the variety available. I enjoy Manchester United in English Soccer. No this is not tv being filmed. The rate is anything between 186kbps ~ 240kbps. I have watched all the Indian Cricket series thus far - Pakistan, SA, Australia, SL-Ind-Ban TriSeries, SA in Windies, the local English League cricket and even the recent Twenty20 Club championship in England. If you’d like any more info shoot me an email.
Can’t wait for the Super Series circus to start rolling!
October 4th, 2005 at 1.37 pm
Dont do Willow, so cannot honestly compare. But there have been many who have used both and opt for sportingstreams.com. Quality and variety. No, its not someone filming TV. Rate is at anything between 186kbps ~ 250kbps. They are trying to up it to around 300kbps which would be good, but existing quality is great, especially when considering the price also.
I have been pretty much happy with the quality. If you need any more info shoot me an email.
Can’t wait for the SuperSeries circus to get rolling.
October 5th, 2005 at 7.39 pm
sorry about the double comments. i guess the comments did not post straightaway, since they may have been parked for moderation.
October 6th, 2005 at 2.47 pm
Checked that site out rj and as i normally use willow i can compare the two,pros have to be the price,was also sceptical,but as you say it certainly works,was watching at 205kbps,which was fine and bufferless,the only cons i would say,it takes a while to work out the system ie sending off for the link,putting in the password,into winamp etc guess next time i will allow 5 mins extra
October 6th, 2005 at 7.31 pm
Yes that is true, but its a good and, on hindsight, essential safeguard. Counting down the clock for ODI2 to get underway. Hope RoW pull themselves together into a fighting team.